Should security officers on a plane be armed with a taser rather than a gun? - taser gun puncture
Because of a firearm by a bullet that could penetrate the side of the aircraft.
Friday, February 5, 2010
Taser Gun Puncture Should Security Officers On A Plane Be Armed With A Taser Rather Than A Gun?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
good in theory, if security is completed at airports who have all the problems, the causes are disarmed, then I would say that Taser would be better!
ReplyDeletegood in theory, if security is completed at airports who have all the problems, the causes are disarmed, then I would say that Taser would be better!
ReplyDeleteI hope that the guard would be a better target, have to kill the side of the airplane.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I am, if someone is in danger of thinking of the lives of others, the move must be killed.
If someone is stupid enough to take a hit so they just need a shot in the head.
I do not know what his mental problems, or mocked them, or whatever.
So yes, you should have a weapon, because the criminal is most likely.
The lives of innocent bystanders are much more important than the armed crazy thoughts.
Air marshals special bullets for the weapons that do not do the skin plate of the air dielectric. You need to close the offender Taser him. It may be in the room to shoot.
ReplyDeleteAnother point ... Tasering is not always immediately incapacitate a person. If we are talking about a terrorist who could shoot a level, you want him, and now ... did not have time to hurt someone.
I think everyone boarding an airplane must have a knife like Rambo So if someone hyjacker defend against a small army. may be poorly trained, but I bet he will think twice, em
ReplyDelete